Skip to content

Brothers all? The Operation of the Electoral College in the 2010 Labour Leadership Contest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)708-731
Number of pages24
JournalParliamentary Affairs
Volume66
Journal issue4
Early online date4 Jun 2012
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Abstract

This article analyses the wealth of data released by the Labour Party on its 2010 leadership election. We uncover the way in which the list of candidates was expanded via the initial nomination process in the parliamentary Labour Party and highlight the artificiality of some candidacies. We find little evidence in the voting data to support the belief that the Miliband brothers represented two sides of an ideological divide but highlight the profound importance of union nominations in the overall outcome. In the process, our analysis raises significant questions about the practical viability and normative desirability of the electoral college.

    Research areas

  • Labour Party

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Brothers All

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Parliamentary Affairs following peer review. The version of record Hugh Pemberton and Mark Wickham-Jones (2013) Brothers all? The Operation of the Electoral College in the 2010 Labour Leadership Contest in Parliamentary Affairs, volume 66 (4): 708-731 is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss012. First published online June 4, 2012.

    Accepted author manuscript, 518 KB, PDF-document

Links

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups