Skip to content

Overpowering: How the powers ontology has overreached itself

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-383
Number of pages43
JournalMind
Volume125
Journal issue498
Early online date27 Apr 2016
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jun 2016

Abstract

Many authors have argued in favour of an ontology of properties as powers and it has been widely argued that this ontology allows us to address certain philosophical problems in novel and illuminating ways, for example causa- tion, representation, intentionality, free will, and liberty. I argue that the ontol- ogy of powers, even if successful as an account of fundamental natural proper- ties, does not provide the insight claimed as regards the aforementioned non- fundamental phenomena. I focus on and criticise the powers theory of causa- tion presented by Mumford and Anjum (2011), and argue that related criticisms can be directed at other abuses of (the ontology of) powers.

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Oxford University Press at http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv207. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 199 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 27/04/18

    Request copy

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups