Skip to content

A classic that wasn't: Statistical geography and paths only later taken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalProgress in Human Geography
Early online date27 Jan 2019
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 7 Jan 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 27 Jan 2019

Abstract

Science is a cumulative activity, a body of knowledge sedimented in its publications, which form the foundation for further activity. Some items attract more attention than others; some are largely ignored. This paper looks at a largely overlooked book – Statistical Geography – published by three US sociologists when geographers were launching their ‘quantitative revolution’. A book with that title could have been seminal. But is was not, and as a consequence – as illustrated with three examples – major issues in spatial analysis were not addressed in the revolution’s early years. The paper explores why.

    Research areas

  • Statistical Geography, quantitative revolution, scientific progress

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Sage at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309132519826684 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 353 KB, PDF-document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups