Skip to content

An exploratory study on the beliefs about gender-based violence held by incoming undergraduates in England

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Rachel Fenton
  • Cassandra Jones
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Gender-Based Violence
Issue number2
Early online date1 Dec 2017
DateAccepted/In press - 4 Oct 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 1 Dec 2017
DatePublished (current) - Dec 2017


A growing body of research indicates that gender-based violence is a public health problem for UK universities. To date, there is a paucity of knowledge about beliefs regarding gender-based violence among UK university students and how receptive they are to help change university culture by participating in prevention programmes. This article uses findings from the first cross-sectional study in England that measured beliefs, including rape and domestic violence and abuse (DVA) myth acceptance, and readiness for change. A survey was given to 381 incoming undergraduate students attending a university in the South West of England. The findings suggest that men endorse rape and DVA myths more than women. Rape myths were associated with DVA myths and further analyses indicated that the subscales He didn't mean to and It wasn't really rape predicted DVA myths. Denial of the problem of sexual violence and DVA was predicted by myth endorsement but assuming responsibility for change was not. These findings provide insight into the particular myths held by incoming undergraduates and how they operate together to scaffold gender-based violence in university settings. Rape and DVA myths need to be targeted in the development of effective prevention programmes in English Universities.

    Research areas

  • bystander intervention, domestic violence myths, prevention, rape myths, students, universities

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Policy Press at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 314 KB, PDF document


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups