Skip to content

Analysis of particulate distributed across Fukushima Prefecture: Attributing provenance to the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident or an alternate emission source

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-152
Number of pages11
JournalAtmospheric Environment
Volume212
Early online date24 May 2019
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 19 May 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 24 May 2019
DatePublished - 1 Sep 2019

Abstract

Over eight years have now passed since the chain of events that occurred at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) and despite this, considerable research effort continues to be expended - yielding results pertinent to understanding the conditions behind the numerous radioactivity release events. As well as investment in this extensive scientific research, great effort is also being directed to the large-scale remediation of the radiologically-affected area and is set to continue for the foreseeable future. Central to this has been the study of the highly-volatile and high-yield fission products of cesium (134Cs and 137Cs) and iodine (129I and 131I), which were together dispersed at considerable total activities as a consequence of the accident. In contrast to investigating the distribution (and state) of these high activity fission products, this study examined fragments of transition metals, rare earth elements and actinides found adhered to a diverse range of organic samples collected from localities across the radiologically contaminated Fukushima Prefecture. As well as varying enormously in their elemental composition, the entrapped particulates comprised a wide size range (150 nm to >10 μm). For particulate of certain compositions (including Ag, Ce, Sm, and Au), a correlation was observed between their size and the distance at which they were encountered from the FDNPP. While a trend was apparent for these and several other composition particles, other materials (including Zr, Pb, Sn, and Ba) could not be described by such a strongly-negative linear trend. Although a Fukushima provenance could be apportioned to a component of the material, an alternate source is necessary to account for a significant inventory of the particulate material. Although contrasting provenances may exist, both the size and composition of this particulate could represent potentially significant health implications for exposed populations.

    Research areas

  • Fukushima, particulate, plume, deposition, uranium, REE

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Elsevier at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.043 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 2 MB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups