Skip to content

Anthropogenic noise alters dwarf mongoose responses to heterospecific alarm calls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-483
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume223
Early online date30 Jan 2017
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 17 Jan 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 30 Jan 2017
DatePublished (current) - Apr 2017

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise is an evolutionarily novel and widespread pollutant in both terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Despite increasing evidence that the additional noise generated by human activities can affect vocal communication, the majority of research has focused on the use of conspecific acoustic information, especially sexual signals. Many animals are known to eavesdrop on the alarm calls produced by other species, enhancing their likelihood of avoiding predation, but how this use of heterospecific information is affected by anthropogenic noise has received little empirical attention. Here, we use two field-based playback experiments on a habituated wild population of dwarf mongooses (Helogale parvula) to determine how anthropogenic noise influences the response of foragers to heterospecific alarm calls. We begin by demonstrating that dwarf mongooses respond appropriately to the alarm calls of sympatric chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) and tree squirrels (Paraxerus cepapi); fleeing only to the latter. We then show that mongoose foragers are less likely to exhibit this flee response to tree squirrel alarm calls during road-noise playback compared to ambient-sound playback. One explanation for the change in response is that noise-induced distraction or stress result in maladaptive behaviour. However, further analysis revealed that road-noise playback results in increased vigilance and that mongooses showing the greatest vigilance increase are those that do not subsequently exhibit a flee response to the alarm call. These individuals may therefore be acting appropriately: if the greater gathering of personal information indicates the absence of an actual predator despite an alarm call, the need to undertake costly fleeing behaviour can be avoided. Either way, our study indicates the potential for anthropogenic noise to interfere with the use of acoustic information from other species, and suggests the importance of considering how heterospecific networks are affected by this global pollutant.

    Research areas

  • eavesdropping, environmental change, noise pollution, predation risk, vocal communication

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Science Direct at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.049 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 1 MB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups