Skip to content

Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: A benchmarking study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere026685
Number of pages11
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number4
Early online date29 Apr 2019
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 25 Mar 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 29 Apr 2019
DatePublished (current) - Apr 2019

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relative performance of hip prosthesis constructs as compared with the best performing prosthesis constructs and illustrate the substantial variability in performance of currently used prostheses.

DESIGN: A non-inferiority study.

SETTING: The National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR).

PARTICIPANTS: All patients with a primary total hip replacement registered in the NJR between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2016.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier failure function for hip prosthesis constructs. Failure difference between best performing construct and remaining constructs.

METHODS: Using a non-inferiority analysis, the performance of hip prosthesis constructs by brand were compared with the best performing contemporary construct. Construct failure was estimated using the 1-Kaplan-Meier survival function method, that is, an estimate of net failure. The difference in failure between the contemporary benchmark and all other constructs was tested.

RESULTS: Of the 4442 constructs used, only 134 had ≥500 procedures at risk at 3 years postprimary, 89 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior to the benchmark by at least 100% relative risk. By 10 years postprimary, there were 26 constructs with ≥500 at risk, 13 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior by at least 20% relative risk.Even fewer constructs were not inferior to the benchmark when analysed by age and gender. At 5 years postprimary, there were 15 constructs in males and 11 in females, aged 55-75 years, not shown to be inferior.

CONCLUSIONS: There is great variability in construct performance and the majority of constructs have not been demonstrated to be non-inferior to contemporary benchmarks. These results can help to inform patients, clinicians and commissioners when considering hip replacement surgery.

Additional information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

    Structured keywords

  • Centre for Surgical Research

    Research areas

  • benchmarking, hip arthroplasty, medical devices, national joint registry, non-inferiority

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via BMJ Publishing at https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/4/e026736 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 5 MB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups