Skip to content

Comparative Law and Legal Culture: Placing Vicarious Liability in Comparative Perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265–293
Number of pages29
JournalChinese Journal of Comparative Law
Volume6
Issue number2
Early online date20 Oct 2018
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 19 Aug 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 20 Oct 2018
DatePublished (current) - 1 Dec 2018

Abstract

Vicarious liability—that is, strict liability for the torts of others—is a doctrine that crosses legal systems. It is found not only in common law systems but also in civil law and hybrid socialist legal systems, such as that of China. The formulation of vicarious liability set out in Article 34 of the 2009 Chinese Tort Liability Law reflects the common elements found across legal systems of the world: an employer/employee relationship; a tort; being committed in the course of the performance of the employee’s duties. From the 2017 proposals to redraft the tort provisions of the French Civil Code to recent developments in the United Kingdom, Australia, Hong Kong, and China, this article will use the doctrine of vicarious liability to examine how comparative law can provide insights into law-making and legal culture.

    Research areas

  • vicarious liability, Comparative law

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Oxford University Press at https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxy007. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 723 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 20/10/20

    Request copy

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups