Skip to content

Compressive behaviour of 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane honeycombs with graded densities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-142
Number of pages13
JournalMaterials and Design
Volume162
Early online date14 Nov 2018
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 7 Nov 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 14 Nov 2018
DatePublished (current) - 15 Jan 2019

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication of thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPUs) offers a capability to manufacture tailorable, flexible honeycomb structures which can be optimised for energy absorbing applications. This work explores the effect of a range of grading methodologies on the energy absorbing and damping behaviour of flexible TPU honeycomb structures. By applying density grading, the energy absorbing and damping profiles are significantly modified from the uniform density equivalent. A 3D-printing procedure was developed which allowed the manufacture of high-quality structures, which underwent cyclic loading to densification without failure. Graded honeycomb architectures had an average relative density of 0.375 ± 0.05. After quasi-static testing, arrays were subjected to sinusoidal compression over a range of amplitudes at 0.5 Hz. By grading the structural density in different ways, mechanical damping was modified. Cyclic compressive testing also showed how strain-softening of the TPU parent material could lead to reduced damping over the course of 50 cycles. Samples were subjected to impact loading at strain-rates of up to 51 s-1 and specific impact energies of up to 270 mJ/cm3. Lower peak loads were transferred for graded samples for the most severe impact cases. This behaviour reveals the potential of density grading of TPU structures to provide superior impact protection in extreme environmental conditions.

    Research areas

  • Additive manufacturing, Cellular structures, Functional grading, Thermoplastic polyurethane

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Elsevier at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127518308256 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 4 MB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups