Skip to content

Expertise affects inter-observer agreement at peripheral locations within a brain tumor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
StateAccepted/In press - 4 Sep 2017

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial tool for clinical brain tumor detection and delineation. Since the process of gross tumor volume delineation resides with clinicians, a better understanding of how they perform this task is required if improvements in life expectancy are to be made. Novice-expert comparison studies have been used to examine the effect of expertise on abnormality detection, but little research has investigated expertise-related differences in brain tumor delineation. In this study, undergraduate students (novices) and radiologists (experts) inspected a combination of T1 and T2 single and whole brain MRI scans, each containing a tumor. Using a tablet and stylus to provide an interactive environment, participants had an unlimited amount of time to scroll freely through the MRI slices and were instructed to delineate (i.e. draw a boundary) around any tumorous tissue. There was no reliable evidence for a difference in the gross tumor volume or total number of slices delineated between experts and novices. Agreement was low across both expertise groups and significantly lower at peripheral locations within a tumor than central locations. There was an interaction between expertise level and location within a tumor with experts displaying higher agreement at the peripheral slices than novices. An effect of brain image set on the order in which participants inspected the slices was also observed. The implications of these results for the training undertaken by early career radiologists and current practices in hospitals are discussed.

    Research areas

  • Brain tumor, novice-expert differences, tumor delineation, medical image perception, radiological diagnosis

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Accepted author manuscript, 745 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/99

    Request copy

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups