Skip to content

From horizontal to vertical labour governance: The International Labour Organization (ILO) and decent work in global supply chains

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536-559
Number of pages24
JournalHuman Relations
Volume71
Issue number4
Early online date8 Sep 2017
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 12 Jun 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 8 Sep 2017
DatePublished (current) - 1 Apr 2018

Abstract

The role of the International Labour Organization (ILO) in the governance of global supply chains is typically neglected or simply dismissed as ineffective. This is understandable as global supply chains have undermined the traditional nation state (horizontal) paradigm of global labour governance, most notably the international Conventions agreed by the tripartite constituents (governments, employers and workers’ representatives) of the ILO. But this simply poses the question of whether, and if so how, the ILO can reframe the system of global labour governance to include the (vertical) global supply chains that all too often fail to deliver ‘decent work for all’. Based on an extended ethnographic study, we demonstrate how policy entrepreneurs (international civil servants) within the ILO can play a pivotal role in not only reframing the discourse in a way that resonates with the ‘lived experiences’ of constituents but also ‘orchestrate’ the social partners in order to secure majority support for a process that might ultimately lead to a new standard (Convention) for decent work in global supply chains. A new approach to employment relationships in global supply chains is ‘in the making’, with the potential to improve working conditions and rights at work for millions across the globe.

    Research areas

  • decent work, discursive institutionalism, global labour governance, global supply chains, international labour standards, strategic framing

    Structured keywords

  • Perspectives on Work

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Sage at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018726717719994 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 686 KB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups