Skip to content

Interventions in Health Settings for Male Perpetrators or Victims of Intimate Partner Violence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Laura Tarzia
  • Kirsty Forsdike
  • Gene Feder
  • Kelsey Hegarty
Original languageEnglish
JournalTrauma, Violence, and Abuse
Early online date4 Dec 2017
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 6 Nov 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 4 Dec 2017

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is common in patients attending health care services and is
associated with a range of health problems. The majority of IPV perpetrators are men and a substantial
minority of men are victims, yet health care professionals have little evidence or guidance on how to respond
to male patients who perpetrate or experience violence in their intimate relationships.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review to determine the effectiveness of interventions for male
perpetrators or victims of IPV in health settings. Online databases, reference lists, Google Scholar, and grey
literature were searched and inclusion/exclusion criteria applied. Narrative synthesis methods were used due
to the heterogeneity of study types and outcome measures.
Results: Fourteen studies describing 10 interventions met our inclusion criteria: 9 randomised controlled trials,
4 cohort studies and 1 case control study. Interventions were predominantly therapeutic in nature and many
were conducted in alcohol treatment settings.
Conclusion: Overall, the evidence for effectiveness of interventions in health care settings was weak, although
IPV interventions conducted concurrently with alcohol treatment show some promise. More work is urgently
needed in health care services to determine what interventions might be effective, and in what settings, to
improve the response to male perpetrators or victims of IPV.

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Sage at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1524838017744772. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 303 KB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups