Skip to content

Introducing OMOV: the Labour party-trade union review group and the 1994 leadership contest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Introducing OMOV: the Labour party-trade union review group and the 1994 leadership contest. / Wickham-Jones, Mark.

In: British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{ce0d667e764c472096d189e978b13533,
title = "Introducing OMOV: the Labour party-trade union review group and the 1994 leadership contest",
abstract = "Most scholars conclude the introduction of one member, one vote (OMOV) into the electoral college that chooses the Labour leader demonstrates a new, reduced role for the party’s affiliated trade unions. This article examines the adoption of OMOV by Labour. It looks at discussions in the Labour party-trade union review group that moulded the decision to adopt OMOV during 1992-93. Drawing on the full breakdown of results, it goes on to examine the outcome of the 1994 leadership contest. The distribution of votes, union by union, indicates that, contrary to the conventional view, trade union leaderships retained the capacity to shape the pattern of voting through their ability to nominate candidates. The article concludes that the introduction of OMOV did not reduce the role of trade union leaderships in Labour’s internal affairs in the manner that many scholars have concluded to be the case.",
author = "Mark Wickham-Jones",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8543.2012.00910.x",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0007-1080",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

RIS - suitable for import to EndNote

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introducing OMOV: the Labour party-trade union review group and the 1994 leadership contest

AU - Wickham-Jones, Mark

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Most scholars conclude the introduction of one member, one vote (OMOV) into the electoral college that chooses the Labour leader demonstrates a new, reduced role for the party’s affiliated trade unions. This article examines the adoption of OMOV by Labour. It looks at discussions in the Labour party-trade union review group that moulded the decision to adopt OMOV during 1992-93. Drawing on the full breakdown of results, it goes on to examine the outcome of the 1994 leadership contest. The distribution of votes, union by union, indicates that, contrary to the conventional view, trade union leaderships retained the capacity to shape the pattern of voting through their ability to nominate candidates. The article concludes that the introduction of OMOV did not reduce the role of trade union leaderships in Labour’s internal affairs in the manner that many scholars have concluded to be the case.

AB - Most scholars conclude the introduction of one member, one vote (OMOV) into the electoral college that chooses the Labour leader demonstrates a new, reduced role for the party’s affiliated trade unions. This article examines the adoption of OMOV by Labour. It looks at discussions in the Labour party-trade union review group that moulded the decision to adopt OMOV during 1992-93. Drawing on the full breakdown of results, it goes on to examine the outcome of the 1994 leadership contest. The distribution of votes, union by union, indicates that, contrary to the conventional view, trade union leaderships retained the capacity to shape the pattern of voting through their ability to nominate candidates. The article concludes that the introduction of OMOV did not reduce the role of trade union leaderships in Labour’s internal affairs in the manner that many scholars have concluded to be the case.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2012.00910.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2012.00910.x

M3 - Article

JO - British Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - British Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0007-1080

ER -