Skip to content

Low analytical totals in EPMA of hydrous silicate glass due to sub-surface charging: Obtaining accurate volatiles by difference

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-56
Number of pages9
JournalChemical Geology
Volume505
Early online date7 Dec 2018
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 19 Nov 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 7 Dec 2018
DatePublished (current) - 5 Feb 2019

Abstract

The major and minor element chemistry of silicate glass is commonly measured using electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA). The volatile content (H2O ± CO2) can, additionally, be quantified using “volatiles by difference” (VBD), but a review of literature data shows that this method consistently overestimates the volatile content. We propose that sub-surface charging during EPMA reduces analytical totals, consequently elevating VBD. Sub-surface charging produces an internal electric field due to trapped implanted electrons, resulting in fewer X-rays being generated and their depth of generation being shallower. The maximum electric field strength required to produce the observed overestimation of VBD is calculated to be ~10−1 V·nm−1. Crystals are often used as standards for glass analysis but, as amorphous materials have more defects in the band gap, glasses can trap more electrons resulting in greater amounts of sub-surface charging. As this is not included in matrix corrections, it causes errors for glass analyses, but not for crystal analyses. By calibrating VBD using hydrous glass standards, the effect of charging can be incorporated, and volatile contents can be determined to an accuracy of ±0.1 wt%, compared to overestimation by ~1 wt% using conventional VBD methods.

    Research areas

  • Electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA), Monte Carlo, Silicate glass, Sub-surface charging, Volatiles by difference (VBD), Water

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Elsevier at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254118305758 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 1 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 7/12/19

    Request copy

    Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups