Skip to content

Magma Emplacement Rates and Porphyry Copper Deposits: Thermal Modeling of the Yerington Batholith, Nevada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1653-1672
Number of pages20
JournalEconomic Geology
Volume112
Issue number7
Early online date1 Nov 2017
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 20 Jun 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 1 Nov 2017
DatePublished (current) - Nov 2017

Abstract

Many porphyry copper deposits are associated with granitoid plutons. Porphyry copper deposit genesis is commonly attributed to degassing of pluton-forming intermediate to silicic magma chambers during slow cooling and crystallization. We use numerical simulations of thermal evolution during pluton growth to investigate the links between pluton construction, magma accumulation and solidification, volatile release, and porphyry copper deposit formation. The Jurassic Yerington batholith, Nevada, serves as a case study because of its exceptional exposure, revealing the geometry of three main intrusions. The last intrusion, the Luhr Hill granite, is associated with economic porphyry copper deposits localized over cupolas where dikes and fluid flow were focused. Our simulations for the conceptual model linking porphyry copper deposits with the presence of large, highly molten magma chambers show that the Luhr Hill granite must have been emplaced at a vertical thickening rate of several cm/yr or more. This magma emplacement rate is much higher than the time-averaged formation rates of other batholiths reported in the literature. Such low rates, although common, do not lead to magma accumulation and might be one of the reasons why many granitoid plutons are barren. Based on our results, we formulate the new testable hypothesis of a link between porphyry copper deposit formation and the emplacement time scale of the associated magma intrusion.

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Society of Economic Geologists at https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/segweb/economicgeology/article/112/7/1653/516653/?searchresult=1. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 3 MB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 1/11/18

    Request copy

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups