Skip to content

Occupational Mobility and Living in Deprived Neighbourhoods: Housing Tenure Differences in ‘Neighbourhood Effects’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309-324
Number of pages15
JournalApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy
Issue number4
DateAccepted/In press - 19 Oct 2014
DatePublished (current) - 27 Nov 2015


The literature on neighbourhood effects suggests that the lack of social mobility of some groups has a spatial dimension. It is thought that those living in the most deprived neighbourhoods are the least likely to achieve upward mobility because of a range of negative neighbourhood effects. Most studies investigating such effects only identify correlations between individual outcomes and their residential environment and do not take into account that selection into neighbourhoods is a non-random mechanism. This paper investigates occupational mobility between 1991 and 2001 for those who were employed in Scotland in 1991 by using unique longitudinal data from Scottish Longitudinal Study (SLS). We add to the existing literature by investigating neighbourhood effects on occupational mobility separately for social renters, private renters and home owners. We find that ‘neighbourhood effects’ are strongest for home owners, which is an unexpected finding. We argue that the correlation between characteristics of the residential environment and occupational mobility can at least partially be explained by selection effects: homeowners with the least resources, who are least likely to experience upward mobility, are also most likely to sort into the most deprived neighbourhoods. Social housing tenants experience less selective sorting across neighbourhoods as other than market forces are responsible for the neighbourhood sorting mechanism.

    Research areas

  • neighbourhood effects, occupational mobility, deprivation, selective mobility, longitudinal data

Download statistics

No data available



  • art%3A10.1007%2Fs12061-014-9126-y

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Springer at 10.1007/s12061-014-9126-y. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 226 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups