Skip to content

R-curve behaviour of the mixed-mode I/II delamination in carbon/epoxy laminates with unidirectional and multidirectional interfaces

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article number110949
JournalComposite Structures
Early online date4 May 2019
DateSubmitted - 17 Dec 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 2 May 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 4 May 2019
DatePublished (current) - 1 Sep 2019


To successfully predict the delamination behaviour of the laminated composite structures with fibre bridging, the R-curve has to be studied. This work experimentally investigates the complete R-curve behaviour of the unidirectional and multidirectional carbon/epoxy composite laminates. The delamination tests use the double cantilever beam (DCB), mixed-mode bending (MMB)and end-notched flexure (ENF)specimens for mode I, mixed-mode I/II and mode II loading, respectively. The test results show that the interfacial ply and mode mixity (φ-ratio)have significant influences on the initial fracture toughness, steady-state fracture toughness and fibre bridging length. The ratio between the steady-state fracture toughness and its initial value is approximately same for both interfaces, which indicates a similar enhanced effect of the fibre bridging on the fracture toughness. The Benzeggagh-Kenane (B-K)criterion is capable of representing the relation between the fracture toughness and the φ-ratio. Based on the DCB and MMB test results, the predicted values of the mode II fracture toughness via the B-K criterion are very close to the experimental ones, which illustrates the possibility of determining the mode II fracture toughness without executing the mode II delamination tests. Furthermore, a semi-empirical expression is proposed, which can well predict the mixed-mode I/II delamination behaviour.

    Structured keywords

  • Bristol Composites Institute ACCIS

    Research areas

  • Carbon fibre, Composite laminates, Delamination, R-curve



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Elsevier at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 897 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 4/05/20

    Request copy

    Licence: CC BY-NC-ND


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups