Skip to content

Reformulating the Common Law Rules on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
JournalLegal Studies
DateAccepted/In press - 21 Dec 2017

Abstract

This article revisits the English common law rules on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in personam. It seeks to demonstrate that, mainly due to the narrow conception of the foreign courts’ ‘international jurisdictional competence’, the operation of this aspect of the English conflict-of-laws rules gives rise to problematic outcomes. Subsequently, the article proceeds to identify and evaluate three of the main doctrinal models which have been proposed in response to these shortcomings. It is contended that, despite their virtues, ultimately, none of these models provides the desirable basis for recasting the law. The article’s main contribution is, therefore, to advance an alternative approach for the reformulation of the recognition-and-enforcement regime at common law. In this regard, it is argued that the foreign courts’ international jurisdictional competence should be defined more broadly as to include the jurisdictional ‘gateways’, presently codified within CPR PD 6B para 3.1.

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Accepted author manuscript, 312 KB, PDF-document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/99

    Request copy

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups