Skip to content

Reporting practice, impression management and company performance: a longitudinal and comparative analysis of water leakage disclosure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)801-840
Number of pages40
JournalAccounting and Business Research
Volume45
Issue number6-7
Early online date11 Nov 2015
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 2015
DateE-pub ahead of print - 11 Nov 2015
DatePublished (current) - Dec 2015

Abstract

This paper aims to determine whether corporate reporting practice, consistent with impression management, changes depending upon company performance. A longitudinal analysis, rarely used in prior impression management research, enables changes in annual report disclosures, both narrative and visual, to be identified and considered relative to a company's performance. Our analysis is based upon the disclosure of leakage performance, a strategic and stakeholder issue in the water industry, by all 10 water and sewerage companies (WASCs) in England and Wales over the 7-year period 2005–2006 to 2011–2012. Our longitudinal data are also compared across companies and contrasted with the expert counter account provided by the industry regulator, OFWAT. We find that the level, nature and presentation of a WASC's leakage disclosures change markedly reflective of their performance against OFWAT's target. Our evidence shows that the changes in reporting practice include the use of tactics and presentational methods consistent with impression management, raising concerns regarding the balance and trustworthiness of voluntary disclosures in the annual report. We suggest that the International Accounting Standards Board should further consider their guidance on narrative disclosures, including presentational format, to reduce the scope for impression management within corporate reporting.

    Research areas

  • reporting, impression management, performance, leakage, targets, disclosure

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Taylor & Francis at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00014788.2015.1081554.

    Accepted author manuscript, 435 KB, PDF document

  • Supplementary information PDF - Figure 1

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Taylor & Francis at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00014788.2015.1081554.

    Accepted author manuscript, 96 KB, PDF document

  • Supplementary information PDF - Tables 1-10

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Taylor & Francis at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00014788.2015.1081554.

    Accepted author manuscript, 465 KB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups