Skip to content

Similarities and differences in Theory of Mind responses of patients with anorexia nervosa with and without autistic features

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article number318
Number of pages10
JournalFrontiers in Psychiatry
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 24 Apr 2019
DatePublished (current) - 8 May 2019

Abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to understand and represent mental states of others, a skill which plays a key role in how we interact with people around us. Difficulties with ToM have been posited as an underlying mechanism for autism and implicated in difficulties faced by those with anorexia nervosa (AN). This study examined, both quantitatively and qualitatively, the responses of women between the ages of 14 and 25 years on the Frith-Happé Triangle Animations, a well-validated test of ToM. Participants were split into healthy controls (HC), AN patients (AN), and AN patients with high levels of autistic features (AN+ASF). We found no significant quantitative differences between groups in performance on the task. Qualitatively there were differences between groups, such that AN patients, especially those in the AN+ASF group, were more focused on describing the videos than creating narratives, were more negative in their interpretations, and were much more anxious about their performance. These qualitative differences have clinical implications, including that not all AN patients with autistic features should be assumed to have difficulties with ToM.

    Research areas

  • eating disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorder, women, Theory of Mind, emotional valence

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Frontiers at https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00318/full#h10. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 917 KB, PDF-document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups