Skip to content

Thinking with the uterine: Commentary on ‘Cyborg uterine geography: complicating care and social reproduction’ by Sophie Lewis for Dialogues in Human Geography

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)324-327
Number of pages4
JournalDialogues in Human Geography
Volume8
Issue number3
Early online date8 Nov 2018
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 22 Jun 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 8 Nov 2018
DatePublished (current) - Nov 2018

Abstract

This commentary on Sophie Lewis’s essay, ‘Cyborg uterine geography: complicating care and social reproduction’ considers what a ‘uterine geography’ could offer for thinking about the body, sex, reproduction, pregnancy, birth, afterbirth, care, pain and love in new ways. While affirming the efforts in the text to generate a more complex, more-than-human and queer account of reproduction, it also raises several questions. How do narratives of maternal-fetal ‘violence’ or ‘generosity’ or ‘hospitality’ work in a broader social and political field, and more generally, how can scientific or evolutionary accounts of bodies be put to critical use in social theory? How does a ‘cyborg uterine geography’ differ from other feminist accounts of care? What are the possibilities of drawing on the ‘uterine’ as both a new material and symbolic figure, in light of recent works that emphasise the potential for thinking feminist politics through the brain, the heart, or the gut? And finally, what are the limits of a uterine geography?

    Structured keywords

  • Gender Research Group

    Research areas

  • uterine, reproduction, feminism, pregnancy, body

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Sage at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2043820618800605 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 128 KB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups